Bingo ProjektfГ¶rderung Die BINGO! Umweltlotterie
Die BINGO!-Projektförderung unterstützt Vorhaben aus den Bereichen Natur und Umwelt sowie weltweite entwicklungsbezogener Projekte im Sinne der. Wer BINGO! spielt, tut Gutes für die Umwelt. Seit 20 Jahren ermöglichen die vielen Zuschauer der beliebten Umweltlotterie mit ihrem Loskauf, dass kleine und. Förderungen der Niedersächsischen Bingo-Umweltstiftung können zur Kofinanzierung bei EU-Projekten eingesetzt werden. Entscheidung über die Förderung. Hinweise zur Projektförderung. Die Erträge aus Bingo! Die Umweltlotterie werden zur Förderung von konkreten Projekten im Bereich des Natur- und. Niedersächsische Bingo-Umweltstiftung. Informationen zur Projektförderung und zum Antragsverfahren in Niedersachsen. Förderbereiche: • Umwelt- und.
Förderungen der Niedersächsischen Bingo-Umweltstiftung können zur Kofinanzierung bei EU-Projekten eingesetzt werden. Entscheidung über die Förderung. Die Förderung der NUE-Stiftung unterstützt Vorhaben aus den Bereichen Natur BINGO!-Projekte in Hamburg und Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Projektkarte. bingo umweltlotterie. Details anzeigen Impressum Datenschutz. Für geförderte Projekte Projektförderung des Fördervereins. Sitemap Impressum Datenschutz. Für go here einwandfreien Betrieb unserer Website nutzen wir notwendige Cookies, die nach verlassen Ihres Browsers Beste Spielothek in Hackeboe werden. Erste Veranstaltungen im Freien starten wieder. Notwendige Cookies helfen dabei, eine Webseite nutzbar zu machen, indem sie Grundfunktionen wie Seitennavigation und Zugriff auf sichere Bereiche der Webseite ermöglichen. Datenschutzeinstellungen Für den einwandfreien Betrieb unserer Website nutzen wir notwendige Cookies, die nach verlassen Ihres Browsers gelöscht werden.
These words have increasingly punctuated our current dialogue in Europe — socially, academically, and politically. There are plenty of long-term concepts on how to face Climate Change.
But how can decision-makers and end users face the intermediate challenges Climate Change brings? What is the right path and time scale to address today and be prepared to future climate scenarios?
It addressed average and extreme conditions of Climate Change scenarios in six areas across Europe, from North to South.
Project factsheet:. What was surprising more was the inspiring, valuable and transformative process of engaging stakeholders in the Communities of Practice CoP and the joint co-production of knowledge.
For all the team members it was an incredible rich experience. BINGO brought its key outcomes to different sectors in society and using several ways of communication, fit to the different audiences.
They are: oral and written technical and scientific communications; workshops with stakeholders e. Moreover, the final conference of BINGO was embedded in ECCA the project main results and outcomes were communicated through 27 presentations, among oral presentations, sessions and posters, covering all the six themes of the conference.
At first stages of the project it was not expected that such a great connection among the different case studies would develop.
Although events such as annual meetings and workpackage meetings were scheduled, the team imagined a scenario in which every local team would developed their project mainly on its own, just sharing some results and conclusions with the others in these events.
Not only partners not directly involved to any specific case study such as FUB, SPI and InterSus have been crucial making this link strong, but also the structure of Work packages with its leaders from different teams which was designed.
Moreover, the annual meetings have allowed every single member of the BINGO team getting to know the reality of the other case studies, getting everybody involved and generating many profitable discussions for the benefit of the whole project, regardeless of the case study.
To sum up, this duality of case studies and workpages structures was a complete success, an effective way to turn the local teams into the global BINGO team.
A Community of Practice CoP is a group of significant and diverse stakeholders who share a concern or a passion for something they do, and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly.
A CoP is not necessarily consensus-based, but rather fed by diversity, enabling exchanges, mutual awareness, joined perceptions, implication and actions.
They enable collaborative co-production of knowledge, the development of holistic and actionable strategies to address challenges at hand and help the innovative potential of research results to cross the barrier to practice.
The BINGO CoPs involved researchers and key stakeholders and practitioners who are relevant to address climate change challenges for the local water cycles or systems.
In order to embrace true knowledge transfer and bring practical knowledge and experience into the project, BINGO settled and facilitated a CoP in each research site, according to their own context specificity, guided by a common interactions workshops roadmap.
Reproducing the effects of climate change by modelling climate and up-following impacts are producing a huge amount of data.
The ability to transfer that into "easy" understandable information for acceptance and decision-making processes is from our experience still weak.
Dealing with uncertainties and probabilities for finding more dynamic adaptive measurements is an ongoing process we still have to learn.
The process of communication and building a network between so many great experts all over Europe with their different expertise and problems helped a lot to understand which changes and regarding challenges we are facing.
Because we can only solve the unsolvable together, it is important to see it from all the different perspectives and participate in. The most valuable outcomes from BINGO for the challenges we are facing already, therefor were for me the motivation I get from working with the all the ambitious people and coming and working together as an European community on our future.
Decadal predictions are — like weather forecasts — initial value problems. This means that an accurate decadal prediction or weather forecast is dependent on an accurate measurement of the state of the earth system i.
Measurements of the earth system, however, possess an inherent level of uncertainty. It is simply not possible to perfectly measure the state of the earth system.
In weather forecasting, the different initial states are typically produced by applying random perturbations to the best estimate initial state.
In the MiKlip project, the different initial states for the decadal predictions are produced by simply staggering the start time of the predictions by 24 hours.
The divergence between the different ensemble members can also be used to estimate the confidence in the ensemble mean prediction: little divergence representing higher and large divergence lower confidence.
Individual ensemble members can furthermore be isolated to study best- and worst-case outcomes. Why is it important to downscale decadal climate predictions to medium-high resolution?
Water managers and decision-makers have to make decisions for the short term years without compromising the long term.
On the other side, most adaptation measures are mostly local dependent. Regional climate models are not sufficiently detailed in space and time to support water management decisions.
Decadal predictions allow for detailed prediction of the relevant climate variables decision makers need at the appropriate scale and time they need.
The BINGO methodology was designed to be applied in the very distinct research sites involved in the project, all of them different in terms of climate, geography, socio-economic landscape, local governance and social connections.
As a single hard methodology could not be used in such a diverse set of case studies, the BINGO methodology was developed to be flexible, allowing the work from BINGO had to be adjusted according to the specific characteristics of each site, resulting in several nuances in the application of the BINGO methodology.
The BINGO project, now that it has ended, aims to serve as inspiration for other municipalities across Europe, having in mind that successfully applying the methodologies shared in this e-book requires adaptation to the local characteristics.
This is why we share guidelines for specific common points in each step of the BINGO overall methodology that can be used as the basis to be replicated and adapted.
We developed an online portfolio of adaptation measures that have been collected and analysed in the BINGO project.
The information is focused on strategists, decision makers and policy makers in different sectors, such as water resource management, urban drainage, public water supply and agriculture.
The information in the database is primarily focus on governance aspects of the measures, using the three-layer-framework that has also been used in BINGO.
We want to motivate all other regions in Europe to find a fitting adaptation measure for their issue — but with the awareness that each measure should serve as inspiration and be adjusted to the local specificities of the municipality which will apply them.
BINGO gave us the opportunity to significantly improve our experience in the usage and interpretation of climate data, based on reanalysis products, decadal predictions, and climate projections Work Package 2.
For instance, in order to capture accurately extreme convective rainfall events, fine spatial and temporal resolution are of crucial importance.
Additionally, the determination of indices like SPI Standardised Precipitation Index and SPEI Standardised Evapotranspiration-Precipitation Index demonstrated to be a robust method for comparison between several data sets, where differences between bias and not bias corrected data sets were negligible.
This approach can be applied to other research sites worldwide, serving as a tool which supports decision making processes for reservoir management.
All simulated climate scenarios decadal predictions as well as climate projections show a negative trend in the current decade in terms of reservoir storage, where none of the data sets reach the maximum storage volume by the end of On the other hand, anthropogenic influences like predicted land and water use were also considered under BINGO.
Thus, implementation of risk reduction measures should be implemented. Indeed, the EWS can significantly reduce flood vulnerability not hazard , expected annual damage EAD and risk for limited costs.
Despite the fact that the analyzed SUDS can only slightly reduce flood hazard not vulnerability , EAD and risk, they have lots of other socio-economic- environmental benefits i.
The structural measures proposed addition of new inlets, sewers and retention tanks are the least convenient from a CBA point of view because the flood EAD reduction is not high enough to compensate the high investment and annual costs of structural measures.
SUDS are the most beneficial measure in terms of net benefit. On the other hand, structural measures do not provide net benefits given that the investment and operational costs are not compensated by the socio-economic benefits they provide.
As less precipitation falls and more water evaporates, the groundwater level at the Veluwe decreases. One dry year has little effect on the groundwater level at the Veluwe and the discharge of streams.
The high parts of the Veluwe react slowly to changes in precipitation and evaporation. In several dry years in a row, the groundwater level decreases further than usual in dry periods.
Also the discharge of the brooks decrease. They can even decrease to zero discharge. Demand for drinking water is increasing as it will become warmer.
In the event of extreme drought, other parts of the Netherlands may also want to make use of the groundwater reserves at the Veluwe.
The farmers will extract more groundwater to prevent damage to the crops. The growing season will also become longer, increasing evaporation and further increasing water demand.
As the temperature rises, the Veluwe will become even more attractive as a recreational area. As a result, the demand for water increases during the summer season.
The warmer climate increases the growth of algae and bacteria, affecting quality of surface water and the water systems dependent on that streams, springs and recreational water.